Home > Hawaii Death Records > No Hospital Records of Obama’s Birth – Mothers Social Security Number is Still Active and in Use

No Hospital Records of Obama’s Birth – Mothers Social Security Number is Still Active and in Use

Attorney Orly Taitz, at the National Press Club on Dec 8th, stated that no hospital in Hawaii has any record of Obama or his mother ever being a patient. Obama’s mother Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro, was reported to have died in Hawaii from cancer in 1992, yet her social security number is still active and in use.

Duration : 0:1:57


[youtube 2I_-ATxzyiM]

  1. kalbahamut
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #1

    He’s produced a …
    He’s produced a birth certificate, had it certified, validated, etc. They’ve proven it in many many different ways. But IDIOTS will refuse to believe the truth. Just like the 9/11 Truth morons, or the people who keep sending me e-mails saying that if I forward it Bill Gates will send me $1000. If you are a so-called “birther” please, for the love of Christ and America and all that is good and holy, KILL YOURSELF. The world will be better off without your genetic material in it.

  2. paolosilv
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #2

    I’ll give Obama the …
    I’ll give Obama the benefit of the doubt for now, because it’s too late. But if he runs in 2012, we must demand the birth certificate.

  3. Vipmaxp
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #3

    crazy italian lady
    crazy italian lady

  4. jedipauly
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #4

    Ur position is so …
    Ur position is so very indefensible its a joke, just like u agent 023. Ur interpretation would have any wealthy foreigner who has a kid on U.S. soil competing 4 Pres with poor Americans who inherit their citizenship from their Am DAD. And u think that is what the framers of Art II had in mind with nbC? I would laugh at u but ur position is so very sad that it just makes me depressed to learn how ignorant u r of ur history & constitution & logic & reason.& law. Stop thinking with ur emotions

  5. jedipauly
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #5

    U r a delusional …
    U r a delusional ignorant moron, 023. 1 day u will be forced 2 face the truth that Art II is talking about INHERITANCE not soil PRIVILEGE. They r both called nbc, only in Art II, Citizen is capitalized as a proper noun to specify we are talking about INHERITANCE not the soil “privilege” citizens. U r just way too uneducated to get it or understand. Sovereignty must be INHERITED, that is the only way 2 obtain a SOVEREIGN citizenship & nation. That is the requirements 4 Pres. I stand by my claims

  6. jedipauly
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #6

    U r such a fool & …
    U r such a fool & idiot, agent 023. U obviously understand nothing about law or politics. What u see as a case dismissed by Land is an example of extreme Judicial corruption & misconduct & a loss 4 u, u r just too stupid 2 understand. Momentum is now building against O. O’s trial is set for Jan 26, dumb shit. U said Carter would dismiss, he has NOT. Judge carter has smacked down O. WTF r u talking about? Carter dismissed O’s motions to dismiss and ordered trial date of Jan 26th. U LOSE!

  7. clarity023
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #7

    jedipauly!


    jedipauly!

    Barnett v Obama dismissed today!

    Judge land and now judge Carter, smack down the crazies (case dismissed), poor little Birthers.

    Not even Fake News Bill OReilly believes the crazies, how funny.

    hahaha!

  8. jedipauly
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #8

    The law now permits …
    The law now permits those born outside of the U.S. to be pres, provided you inherit your citizenship from your American DAD. Originally, you had to be born only subject to U.S. soil jurisdiction, as well as U.S. parents. Our founding fathers did not think we would be an empire with 1000 bases on foreign soil!

  9. Damnyoulose
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #9

    jonedelleman you …
    jonedelleman you know nothing.. NO child nor parent can give up the childs US citizenship. Thats Us law.

    FYI, NBC has never been defined.. Go ahead and prove us wrong cite the case.

  10. Damnyoulose
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #10

    jonedelleman trying …
    jonedelleman trying to pass debunked lies..

    Gee jonedelleman, how could Obama spend 2 million when his lawyer was working pro bono, and soon as he became the President his lawyers are from the Dept Of Justice.

    The birthers are to funny and never learn.

  11. tgear77
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #11

    No, the meaning of …
    No, the meaning of NBC has never been legally defined in the US. That is why it can not be used to strip Obama of the Presidency like you Birthers want to. As for Indonesia, he never lost his US citizenship while there under US law. So that matters not. The big pink elephant in the room is why can’t Birthers accept the truth and realize that Obama is President.

  12. tgear77
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #12

    Just for and …
    Just for and giggles, I went to the petition and signed on. Then waited 20 seconds and signed on again. It did not stop me from signing twice. So yeah, that petition is absolutely trustworthy. Probably has a thousand or so idiots who go back time and time again.

  13. tgear77
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #13

    Please explain how …
    Please explain how he is disregarding the Constitution? His predecessor did so with regularity. But how has Obama?

  14. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #14

    notreal, yes, I …
    notreal, yes, I would care. The Constitution is what keeps this country together and we cannot have the man in its highest office disregard the Constitution.

  15. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #15

    lose, those …
    lose, those signatures were not obtained by ACORN, so can trust them to be genuine.

  16. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #16

    Yes, the meaning of …
    Yes, the meaning of “natural born citizen” is defined by law. Look it up .
    I don’t know the Indonesian laws on citizenship. If Obama gave it up, that , too, should be provable.
    The big pink elephant in the room is this:why does he treat the American people with disdain and contempt ??

  17. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #17

    Make that January …
    Make that January 26, 2010. The Justice Department is trying to block it in an unprecendented move. The American people have the rght to know – after all, they pay for the salaries !

  18. tgear77
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #18

    We have a right to …
    We have a right to privacy. No one can view your BC or personal data unless you allow it. No one can view mine unless I allow it. The same holds true for Obama. If there actually is a court case in Jan. (which I doubt there will be) the proper procedure would be for the court to view his BC, not Taitz, not the press. The Judge would then announce that it is or isn’t legitimate.

  19. tgear77
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #19

    THe Vice-President …
    THe Vice-President followed the proper procedures when the Electoral votes were ratified. He asked for objections. There were none. Colburn and Shelby hadn’t jumped on the Birther bandwagon back in December so they had no objections to raise. Now as they try to curry votes among their far right voters, do they squawk about Obama’s birth. If they truly had questions, where were they during the campaign? Where were these objections when they could have helped McCain?

  20. tgear77
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:02 | #20

    No, McCain did not. …
    No, McCain did not. He allowed a small group of reporters 3 hours to view of 13,000 pages in unmarked boxes which contained his health records. His birth certificate was posted online by someone who stole it from evidence in a NJ court case. It was only after it was online that McCain finally recognized it as his.

  21. tgear77
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:03 | #21

    Yet, Bush never …
    Yet, Bush never produced his birth certificate. Clinton never produced his. Poppy Bush never produced his. There is a poor facsimile of Reagan’s at his Presidential Library but that was not produced until after he left office. So I think Obama has provided more proof than previous presidents by posting his COLB online.

  22. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:03 | #22

    1.Did Senators …
    1.Did Senators question the eligibility of Mr. Obama? (Only Senators Coburn and Shelby and a number of House members.)

    2.Were objections made by Members of Congress when the vote of the Electoral College was certified? (NO, then Vice-President Cheney had not performed his required duty of asking for objections, so there could have been none raised.)
    That’s too bad.

  23. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:03 | #23

    jedipauly, no,no, …
    jedipauly, no,no, McCain was totally qualified to run for President; he was born on an American installation. And he showed his health records and his birth certificate and whatever was necessary.
    One of the problems we have is that Dick Cheney never questioned Obama, which he was supposed to have done.

  24. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:03 | #24

    lose, that is silly …
    lose, that is silly. If you were born at home, your birth certificate will state that.
    You have not addressed the question why Obama should be exempt from showing hisbirth certificate or his health records?
    For all we know, his real name might be Donald Donashinski…

  25. jonedelleman
    January 8th, 2010 at 04:03 | #25

    lose, I gave a …
    lose, I gave a wrong date for the case. It is January 26, 2010. The Justice Department, not Obama’s lawyers, is trying to block the hearing. Now that is unprecedented ! The DoJ ! What happened to the separation of powers ?

  1. No trackbacks yet.