Death Records Now

Here are a few things that Obama is hiding from you and all other Americans:

Barack Obama / Stanley Ann Dunham marriage license — Not released

Lolo Soetoro / Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama marriage license — Not released

Record of adoption by Lolo Soetoro — Not released

Baptismal certificate — Not released

Indonesian Passport, renewed for travel to Pakistan, a restricted
nation for U.S. citizens in 1981 — Not released

Student records at Mentung No. 1 public school in Jakarta, Indonesia ­ Not released

Hawaii elementary school records ­ Not released.

Punahou High School records – Not released

How his education at Punahou, a very expensive private school (Current tuition is $17,300/year.),

was paid for.

Selective Service Registration – Released but proven to be Counterfeit

SAT score ­ Not released

Occidental College records – Not released

Columbia College records – Not released

Columbia thesis – Not released

Harvard College records – Not released

Harvard Law Review articles – None (maybe 1, but not signed)

How he paid for his Occidental, Columbia and Harvard education ­ Not released

LSAT score ­ not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles ­ None found

Law practice client list – Not released

Financial records while a community organizer in Chicago ­ Not released

Annenburg Project records – Not released

Illinois State Senate records – None (Locked up to prohibit public view)

Illinois State Senate schedule – ‘Lost’ (ALL other Illinois state senators’ records are intact)

Medical records – Not released

Passport – Not released

Why his social security number allegedly starts with 042, a number
issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977.

Why his mother, Ann Dunham, is reported to have nearly a dozen
aliases, at least two different Social Security numbers, and upwards
of over 99 separate addresses.

Father’s name and address, and if dead, his death certificate. Not released

Mother’s death certificate showing who survivors are. Not released

Mother probate estate records showing who heirs are. Not released

In addition to being simply "Not released" most of these records are
SEALED.
Ah, Lance,…so you don’t know, do you.

Sorry, but I think it is you who should take off the tin foil hat.

You can’t answer any of these points,..can you?

Ha ha ha.
Look,..

If you don’t know why all of the above is happening;

Just say so.

It’s o.k. you know.

🙂

Who is he, and where did he come from? The questions are valid. Why doesn’t he provide the answers.

Like some shambling undead Thing from a horror movie, the amnesty bill we all thought buried with a stake in its heart has been resurrected. Once again it’s headed to the senate floor to wreak havoc. But this is the kind of summer sequel most people don’t want to see. Neither Democrats nor Republicans in Washington seem to understand — or care — how unhappy the American people are about this bill.
And we are unhappy about it… Many Americans are outraged by the idea of rewarding criminals by allowing them to keep what they took. While hundreds of thousands of people around the world patiently await permission to come to this country, or go home when their visas expire, illegals decided the rules didn’t apply to them. Allowing them to become permanent residents violates our sense of fair play almost as much as it violates our laws. We’re assured that they will be at the "back of the line" for citizenship… but that line is supposed to form on the other side of the border.
We’re unhappy about rewarding criminal behavior. We’re told that these illegals should be honored because they wanted to become Americans so badly that many of them risked death to come here. (We’ll just ignore the fact that money was probably the real motivation for most of them.) But becoming American must include showing some regard for American sovereignty, and American laws. Those who deliberately crossed our borders illegally or overstayed their visas did not show that respect. Many ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS falsify records and documents on a daily basis, supply false Social Security numbers to employers, and lie to obtain drivers’ licenses, credit cards and other documents. Moreover, those hundreds of thousands who marched protesting law enforcement waving mexican flags and holding signs saying "This is our continent not yours" didn’t appear to want to become Americans, did they? Why should we reward them for that?
We don’t like the idea of creating a huge permanent underclass of low-level workers, either. Once granted legal status, all those people doing "jobs Americans won’t do" won’t want to do them either — not at the low wages they’re currently paid. They’ll want better jobs, with better pay. Prices for agricultural products and construction will rise as employers are forced to pay minimum wage, but that’s not the worst effect of a mass legalisation. Competition for available jobs in other areas will rise sharply. Competition for many blue-collar jobs will force wages to dip towards minimum wage level, creating a sharper division between blue-collar and white-collar workers, or lower class and middle class. Unemployment and entitlements will rise, and taxes will follow. Class warfare and envy politics fueled by racial divisions — the staples of Democratic campaigns — will escalate, granting the Democrats a huge vote windfall for many years to come. The fact that so many Republicans (including the President himself) are willing to sign the death warrant of their own party is amazing.
Many people are unhappy about this bill because of the way members of Congress and the President tried to shove it through the Senate quickly, without time for the bill to be amended before debate. The Bill was introduced on Thursday 17 May, and a vote to open debate on the final version was scheduled for Monday 21 June. The bill was not even written in final form until that Sunday, and most Senators hadn’t even seen it by the time they were expected to vote, much less had time to draft amendments. Public outcry pushed back the vote to give Senators time to propose amendments and gauge public opinion. After the move for cloture — an attempt to bring the bill up for a vote — failed, the bill was removed from the floor. But President Bush, when attacking opponents of the bill didn’t work, pushed his supporters in the Senate to bring it back after adding some money for border security — the security that was mandated in a bill last year, and about which nothing much was done.
But it’s still the same terrible bill, which grants a de facto amnesty to millions of criminal trespassers (no matter what its proponents want to call it), allowing them to stay as permanent residents and bring tens of millions of new immigrants into the country. Thanks to Liberal "multiculturalism," many of those people will never integrate into American society. It’s like a home invasion on a massive scale, while the government’s response is to tell us we just have to live with our new housemates. And the border fence that was mandated in the Secure Fence Act of 2006 is still not built, which means that in another decade or so, we’ll have to go through all of this again. Before we decide what to do about the estimated 12-20 million illegal immigrants in this country, we have got to ensure that it’s the last time we have to deal with the problem.
Back in 1986, we were told that we would have real border security, in exchange for a one-time amnesty. Well, the politicians got their one-time amnesty. Now, we want our security.
CALL YOUR STATE SENATORS AND VOTE AGAINST THE AMNESTY BILL…
Yeah, I realize its long, but its OUR country, and its worth it…
Hey Spazz or Spass or whatever your calling your next account that will pop up with the same question….you are so funny, wow….ya know what? Just call your senator and say no to the bill…ok?
Let me tell you this…The ILLEGAL mexicans are actually laughing at people like you. They will get as many Stupid American citizens to fight for their cause and when they inevitably take over the country, you will be singing a different tune. Let me ask YOU this….How does it make you feel when they go around waving their flag, burning our flag, and demanding that we speak their language let alone saying that this continent belongs to them….Let me ask you this? How fair is it that other LEGAL immigrants worked hard and patiently waited for their citizenship, only to have this crap thrown in their faces? These are people who fought/worked and sweat off their backs for this country, only to have these disease spreading roaches want to take credit? I think not… OH and let me TELL you this, I will GLADLY welcome a price raise in milk and Macdonalds burgers as long as they arent touching it with their dirty ecoli spreading hands….notice the increase in disease lately?
The above statement is directed to Greg P

Well stated. I completely agree with you.. Also, if this thing passes, imigrants are going to be flooding in and claiming amnesty. I’m kind of scared of all the chaos that will ensue.

Thanks to the Internet, it’s more than possible for anyone who wants to get their hands on court records to do so. Whether they’re proceedings within the state a person resides in or from one a thousand miles a way, online tools make getting court proceedings records very simple.

There are even programs out there that can aid in the process of finding, requesting and obtaining court records from a number of different jurisdictions. These programs can help anyone with the right information get their hands on documents they need to make important decisions about hiring, credit or even dating.

Anyone who is looking into getting their hands on court records does need to know some documents might just not be open to public scrutiny and others will be more difficult to get online depending on the state involved.

In general, these types of court activity records are available through online services:

– Criminal records: Records for criminal proceedings are almost always available for public viewing once a case is closed. This can include everything from findings and sentencing reports to transcripts of the actual hearings themselves.

The only time these records will not be open is in the case of juveniles or for those who have had special proceedings. Also, in the case of rape proceedings, victims’ names might be withheld in documents released by the courts.

– Bankruptcy records: Whether these are for corporations or private residents, these records typically are open. The actual findings and creditors will be listed, but personal information such as Social Security numbers will generally not be available.

– Divorce proceedings: Here and again personal information, especially about minors, might not be fully open to the public, but findings generally will be.

– Civil proceedings: Almost without exception these records and their transcripts will be available for people to pull and see when the cases are closed by the courts. Whether it’s a wrongful death suit or a suit against a company, records can generally be had online.

– Grand jury proceedings: These records are very often closed and transcripts are not even available until such time as the court deems it acceptable to release information. The records of actual findings and rulings might be more readily accessible.

Getting court records online with the help of programs that are designed to speed up the inquiry process is more than doable. These records typically are considered public knowledge and are available for anyone to look at and digest.

Obtaining public records and court records will vary from state to state in the ease that they can be pulled. This is where these programs can come in handy by ensuring the proper requests are filed for documentation.

Legal proceedings records can be very valuable tools in helping people make major decisions about such things as hiring, dating and extending credit. The records that are attainable will, however, vary on the state and the disposition of the case. Thanks to the Internet the process of getting these records is much more easy to traverse.

Ray La Foy
http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/access-court-records-for-indepth-information-139382.html

I’m doing some family history research and I’ve found some death records for certain family members…other documents state that this person was born around 1860 in texas, but when I looked at the state where the social security number was issued it said kansas…why would this be?
keep in mind that this person would have been born a slave in 1860…I’m assuming that he may have moved to kansas sometime after the emancipation of 1863, and that’s where he applied, but I have yet to find a record for him in kansas…all of his children where born in Indian Territory, Oklahoma in the early 1900’s and 19-teens. and I have found census records of that.

Social Security was first enacted in August 1935; payroll taxes were first collected in 1937; the first monthly payment was issued in January 1940, but it wasn’t until 1972 that the US government authorized Social Security to enumerate children at the time they first entered school. Only in 1988 did Congress require a taxpayer identification number, which was ordinarily a Social Security number, of each dependent child age two or older.

Accordingly, US Census records could very well document that your ancestor was born in Texas in 1860, but his or her Social Security records would indicate he or she was living in Kansas at the time his Social Security card was issued. I can personally remember a 9th-grade teacher obtaining Social Security numbers for all his algebra students in 1965, so at that point, enrollment for non-working minors was completely voluntary.

You also need not look for a birth certificate for an ancestor born in 1860 Texas. Indeed, about the best you can do on that score, other than looking at US Census records, is to find his or her birth date recorded in a family bible. Up through the 1920s, births in many states were only recorded if a child was born in a hospital, but in rural and small town Texas, most children were born at home. My mother and dad who were born in 1920 and 1925 respectively didn’t have thieir birth certificates issued until 1981 when Dad decided to take Mom to Europe and show her just where he had been stationed in World War II. In each case, older siblings swore that they were present at the time of birth.

P. S. African-Americans who were slaves weren’t enumerated until 1870, although depending on the family, the census records are fairly accurate in the latter decades of the 19th century. From 1870 and any time afterwards, a census would prpbably show that your ancestor was born in Texas in 1860.