Home > California Death Records > Do Gays Really Want Tolerance (for themselves and others)?

Do Gays Really Want Tolerance (for themselves and others)?

Here is a story (from AP) about gays going after people who exercised their right to vote. I’ve also seen video on youtube of gays attacking people who were for prop 8. There have also been news stories of them going after churches and their congregations.
Is this the tolerance they scream so loud for?

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – Supporters of the ballot measure that banned same-sex "marriage" in California have filed a lawsuit seeking to block their campaign finance records from public view, saying the reports have led to the harassment of donors.

"No one should have to worry about getting a death threat because of the way he or she votes," said James Bopp, Jr., an attorney representing two groups that supported Proposition 8, Protect Marriage.com and the National Organization for Marriage California. "This lawsuit will protect the right of all people to help support causes they agree with, without having to worry about harassment or threats."

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in federal court in Sacramento, asks the court to order the secretary of state’s office to remove all donations for the proposition from its website. It also asks the court to relieve the two groups and "all similarly situated persons" from having to meet the state’s campaign disclosure requirements. That would include having to file a final report on Proposition 8 contributions at the end of January, as well as reports for any future campaigns the groups undertake.

Proposition 8, approved by 52.3 percent of California voters on Nov. 4, reversed a state Supreme Court decision allowing homosexual marriage. The measure’s opponents have asked the Supreme Court to overturn it.

The lawsuit filed Wednesday cites a series of incidents in which those who gave money to support Proposition 8 received threatening phone calls, e-mails and postcards. One woman claims she was told: "If I had a gun, I would have gunned you down along with each and every other supporter." Another donor reported a broken window, one said a fliyer calling him a bigot was distributed around his hometown and others received envelopes containing suspicious white power, according to the lawsuit.

Businesses employing people who contributed to the Proposition 8 campaign have been threatened with boycotts, the suit said.

Supporters of the homosexual marriage ban fear the donor backlash will hurt their efforts to raise money in the future, perhaps to fight an initiative seeking to overturn the ban.

"Several donors have indicated that they will not contribute to committee plaintiffs or similar organizations in the future because of the threats and harassment directed at them as a result of their contributions…and the public disclosure of that fact," the lawsuit said.

The suit said courts have held that laws requiring disclosure of campaign contributions can be overturned or restricted if a group can make "an uncontroverted showing" that identifying its members can result in economic reprisals or threats of physical coercion. California’s Political Reform Act, which voters approved in 1974, established disclosure requirements for candidates and campaign committees.

The secretary of state’s office and another defendant, the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission, declined to comment Thursday on the lawsuit. But Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, the homosexual-rights group that led the campaign against Proposition 8, called it hypocritical for supporters of the measure to try to overturn voter-approved campaign finance laws.

He said Proposition 8 supporters used campaign finance records during the campaign to threaten homosexual-rights supporters. "They’ve used these records to attack corporations, to attack individuals," Kors said.

Peter Scheer, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, which supports public access to government records and meetings, said the lawsuit is likely to be unsuccessful. But he also said the plaintiffs’ arguments are not trivial. "The problem with their argument, of course, is that campaign finance laws, both at the state and federal level, have been litigated endlessly now since Watergate and the argument has, in one form or another, been rejected," Scheer said.

He said courts have consistently failed to agree that contributors have a right to donate directly and anonymously to a candidate or campaign. He said some states have less restrictive reporting requirements, but they always include disclosure of donors.

Gays want tolerance for them, but they would still want to bash Christians.

  1. ZER0 C00L •AM• •VT• ? GODLESS ?
    April 1st, 2010 at 16:12 | #1

    Yep, they really do. At least most of them.

    And by the way, people should have known that they can’t directly donate and get away with keeping their name off of some public list. Like the article said…

    "The problem with their argument, of course, is that campaign finance laws, both at the state and federal level, have been litigated endlessly now since Watergate and the argument has, in one form or another, been rejected," Scheer said.

    He said courts have consistently failed to agree that contributors have a right to donate directly and anonymously to a candidate or campaign. He said some states have less restrictive reporting requirements, but they always include disclosure of donors.
    References :

  2. Link strikes back
    April 1st, 2010 at 16:18 | #2

    Most do

    A few don’t.
    References :

  3. bob
    April 1st, 2010 at 17:07 | #3

    Don’t judge over a small group of people.

    Also, since it’s from AP, it’s impossible to analyze if the paper it was written for had any bias.
    References :

  4. josh!!!! (*_*)
    April 1st, 2010 at 17:35 | #4

    Oh my god that’s long. I’m not gonna read that.
    I’m just gonna answer, I’d say that the vast majority want tolerance for themselves and others yes.
    References :

  5. Bubbha Jo
    April 1st, 2010 at 18:00 | #5

    The disclosure of campaign donors issue has nothing to do about tolerance. Apples and oranges. All should be tolerated just how they are born. Campaign donations are a choice.
    References :

  6. Emily C
    April 1st, 2010 at 18:35 | #6

    We’ll see how Christians feel when their rights are taken away by a legal vote, I bet you won’t behave any better
    References :

  7. Raith is teh Ghoast Kitteh
    April 1st, 2010 at 18:49 | #7

    That was way too long so I didn’t read it, sorry. But I will say that we do want tolerance for ourselves and others. Even more than that, we want respect.
    References :

  8. Weemaryanne
    April 1st, 2010 at 19:03 | #8

    I thought godsters were big on everybody taking responsibility for the consequences of their actions.

    They acted. These are the consequences. Now they get the opportunity to be good little godsters by taking responsibility. Good on ’em, I say.
    References :

  9. Hig
    April 1st, 2010 at 19:22 | #9

    Gays want tolerance for them, but they would still want to bash Christians.
    References :

  1. No trackbacks yet.