Home > California Death Records > Why is California making it mandatory for children to learn about a sexual predator who abused young boys?

Why is California making it mandatory for children to learn about a sexual predator who abused young boys?

Lawmakers in California have voted to pressure all schoolchildren in the state to study and "honor" the life and values of homosexual activist Harvey Milk, whose biography tells of sexual escapades, including relationships with young boys.

Harvey Milk Gay Day’ would teach schoolkids all about the life and very controversial values of Harvey Milk. Based on the historical record of Milk’s sordid life, this could include teaching elementary and secondary schoolchildren that adult-child homosexual ‘sex’ is OK, having multiple sexual relationships at the same time is OK, and telling a very public lie is good if it ‘gets you ahead.’ This instruction, whether taught directly or indirectly, is not what parents want or children need.

What the heck is going on in California?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/09/lawmakers-pass-bill-to-honor-harvey-milk.html

In addition, it was Milk who publicly advocated for the late Jim Jones, the leader of the massacred hundreds in Jonestown, Guyana, in 1978. Jones led the "Peoples Temple Agricultural Project," and in an audiotape of the deaths, described the 918 fatalities – mostly from drinking cyanide-laced flavored drink – as a "revolutionary suicide."
KevinART – it’s in his Biography.
Harvey Milk was not only a homosexual activist, but had a fondness for boys, including a 16-year-old.

Between the liberal strong hold that Cali is and the sheer amount of perverts that live there its bad environment for kids to grow up in.

  1. Kevin A.R.T.
    March 16th, 2010 at 16:16 | #1

    Who told you Harvey Milk had relationships with young boys, or was a sexual predator? I guess the same person that told you Obama was born in Kenya.

    Oh, and just because you are personally bigoted against homosexuals does not mean our schools should be as well. Should we teach them racism, too?
    References :

  2. brown9500.v8
    March 16th, 2010 at 16:39 | #2

    To protect them from Republicans.
    References :

  3. McMeth3.0
    March 16th, 2010 at 17:15 | #3

    why dont’ you tell them instead
    References :

  4. Thank you Blue Dogs
    March 16th, 2010 at 17:43 | #4

    Between the liberal strong hold that Cali is and the sheer amount of perverts that live there its bad environment for kids to grow up in.
    References :

  5. g
    March 16th, 2010 at 17:53 | #5

    so… if we teach about ben franklin… JFK… Caesar Augustus…

    does that also mean we are promoting their sexual behaviors?

    my, what a small history class you would have…
    References :

  6. Boozette Jones
    March 16th, 2010 at 18:37 | #6

    To protect them from Barney Franks.
    Remember learning about fire safety this is like molester safety.

    Oh they are honoring a pedophile?
    Ben Franklin does not even have a day, yet this monster does.
    Grand.
    References :

  7. Steve
    March 16th, 2010 at 19:07 | #7

    Don’t people work in the Blue Grass, you have to much time on your hands. Go dig for coal or something.
    God Bless.
    References :

  8. PerfectStorm70
    March 16th, 2010 at 19:21 | #8

    Lawmakers in California have voted to pressure all schoolchildren in the state to study and "honor" the life and values of homosexual activist Harvey Milk, whose biography tells of sexual escapades, including relationships with young boys.

    How can they this is completely unconstitutional. They have no right to force people to honor anyone. This kind of stuff is going to continue unless the radical left is finally stopped. By any means necessary if need be.

    The brainwashing and indoctrination that is done by the left in the name of so called Tolerance has to stop. "Tolerance" doesn’t trump the Constitution".

    Can you imagine if the Right tried to force people to honor Ronald Regan in California as being the greatest president ever and then tried to brainwash the children into believing this as well.

    I have had it with the Politically Correct fascism that comes from theses dogs on the left who hide behind TOLERANCE. When the left tolerates nothing and nobody who thinks and feels differently then they do.

    If I lived in California I would sue the hell out of the schools for violating my Civil liberties in trying to tell me or my children what they should think and feel when it comes certain political or social issues and the people that are part of them. Where’s the ACLU?
    References :

  9. AUBURN
    March 16th, 2010 at 20:02 | #9

    Man, that is horribly sick and just downright wrong. I wasn’t too surprised to see Sean Penn in a bio-pic about Mr. Milk but it is disturbing to see that Milk’s so-called "values" are being presented to kids as a study project.
    References :

  10. good guy
    March 16th, 2010 at 20:15 | #10

    they aren’t.

    pot, meet kettle.
    References :

  11. Maxwell
    March 16th, 2010 at 20:23 | #11

    So far as I can tell it is simply about making sure kids know it is okay to be gay and that you can still achieve an elected office if you are, since Milk didn’t do anything meaningful when he was in office.
    References :

  12. carmenlafond
    March 16th, 2010 at 20:42 | #12

    Was it rape when Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings children? I never studied that in school. Harvey Milk was never charged with sex crimes. As a female I learned nothing about women in history except Betsy Ross sewed the flag. Maybe it’s good to hear about some other people in history.
    References :

  13. Nicolae Carpathia
    March 16th, 2010 at 20:49 | #13

    Because California’s full of whackjobs?
    References :
    We’re going to have a lot of cleaning up to do when our 10 million sleepers decide it’s time to take California back.

  14. Diana
    March 16th, 2010 at 20:55 | #14

    I no longer live in the golden state, thank goodness. I hadn’t heard of that one.If you want to putt in the butt, keep it to yourself.
    They had a movie about that guy and frankly I was angered.
    References :

  15. oimwoomwio
    March 16th, 2010 at 21:20 | #15

    Sorry, but your link doesn’t mention young boys anywhere at all.

    So Harvey Milk was gay.

    Big effin’ deal.

    The poeple in Jonestown pretty much got what they signed up for, don’t you think?

    Why would you want to blame somebody else for it??
    References :

  16. Hurtsdonut
    March 16th, 2010 at 21:58 | #16

    It’s California, what do you expect? You can’t really judge them by any normal standards of behavior. I think they latch on to things like this just to show how bizarre they can be.
    References :

  17. Paul Grass
    March 16th, 2010 at 22:07 | #17

    if he had sex with a 16 yr old, then Harvey Milk was a criminal a sexual predator as defined by law in all fifty states for his admission to having sex with under aged boys. That he is honored is a travesty of justice, not a gay bash. Sex with under aged children is illegal.
    References :

  1. No trackbacks yet.