Home > Hawaii Death Records > A Real Birth Certificate and Official Statement from Hawaii

A Real Birth Certificate and Official Statement from Hawaii

December 10th, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

This is the official statement from the State of Hawaii on Obama’s Birth Certificate, before the media put their spin on it.

Here is an excellant article titled “Clearing the Smoke on Obamas Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigators June 10 Report”

http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=2697

For Immediate Release: October 31, 2008

STATEMENT BY DR. CHIYOME FUKINO

There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein

Obamas official birth certificate. State law (Hawaii Revised

Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate

to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.

Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along

with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to

oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally

seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has

Sen. Obamas original birth certificate on record in accordance with

state policies and procedures.

No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever

instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different

from any other vital record in the possession of the State of

Hawaii.

http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf

Duration : 0:6:39


[youtube Z8JK442bb2I]

  1. AlpondrickTheGreat
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #1

    good post !
    good post !

  2. ImDiscombobulated
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #2

    obama is a fraud.
    obama is a fraud.

  3. BAZHE
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #3

    wow
    wow

  4. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #4

    Are you a fool? Are …
    Are you a fool? Are you now going to maintain that a child can only be a natural born citizen if he was born outside the United States? You are also going to claim that the Naturalization Act of 1790 was not a law? Even Obama and the Senate agreed, that that law did define the term, “natural born citizen”, as it is used in the Constitution. Your mind is like a parachute-if it isn’t open-it will not work.

  5. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #5

    Excellant article, …
    Excellant article, I have to link posted in the info box.

  6. ytba
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #6

    Great video. For …
    Great video. For those whanting to see more detail on what you are saying, they should do a search for this article…. “Clearing the Smoke on Obamas Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigators June 10 Report”
    the website I have it being on is….
    westernjournalism

  7. jayrod59
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #7

    Hawaii Statute 338- …
    Hawaii Statute 338-17.8 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the childs birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence. The parents would be issued a Certification of Live Birth, which is what Obama has shown us. He has never shown us a hospital generated birth certificate because I do not believe he has one to show us.

  8. scully2222
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #8

    “the children of …
    “the children of citizens that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens”

    first of all, notice this quote refers to children born outside the borders of the US. it does not refer to persons born within the borders of the US

    second of all, if its not in the constitution, or a treaty ratified by the senate, or a law passed by congress, its not US law. the so called “Law of Nations” is none of these things. it is not US law.

  9. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #9

    The Naturalization …
    The Naturalization Act of 1795, stated, “the children of citizens of the United States born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States”, leaving the United States and it’s territories, the only area in the world, where the child of US citizens, could be born, and still be considered a “natural born citizen”.

  10. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #10

    That resolution …
    That resolution also states, “the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;” So Obama and the entire Senate agreed that The Naturalization Act of 1790, defined the term “natural born citizen” as meaning the child of US citizens.

  11. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #11

    Obama himself …
    Obama himself agrees with this, as he and the 99 other members of the Senate, Passed by Unanimous Consent, Senate Res. 511, in April 2008, declaring “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

  12. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #12

    No, it is not …
    No, it is not International law, it is the universal principles of law that are followed by every civilized nation on Earth. Read the first immigration law ever passed by Congess, which says, “the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens”. It did not say the child of a US citizen, but the children of citizens. We have discussed this before Scully.

  13. scully2222
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #13

    thats international …
    thats international law, international law has no bearing on US law, other than treaties ratified by the senate.

    does it state anywhere in US law that natural born requires both parents to be citizens?

  14. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #14

    The Law of Nations, …
    The Law of Nations, Vattel 1758, Book 1, chapter 19, paragraph 212- It was the legal reference book that was used by the founders of our nation and those wrote the Constitution. It is still in use today. The concept is also intended in the 14th Amendment, for the only way one could be born, solely under the jurisdiction of the United States, is to be born to 2 US citizen parents. Prior to the 20th century, Dual citizenship was never allowed.

  15. scully2222
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #15

    “a natural born …
    “a natural born citizen is the child of US citizen parents, born on US soil.”

    on what do you base this statement?

  16. nosferotica1
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #16

    Certification of …
    Certification of Live Birth, not a Birth Certificate.

    Do you see the difference? They aren’t the same!

    One is a Certificate of Birth, and one is a Certification of Live Birth.

    THEY AREN’T THE SAME! ONE IS A CERTIFICATION! THE OTHER IS A CERTIFICATE!

    Certification – 1 : the act of certifying : the state of being certified 2 : a certified statement

    Certificate – 1: a document containing a certified statement especially as to the truth of something:

    DIFFERENCE IS NIGHT AND DAY!

  17. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #17

    Thomas Jefferson …
    Thomas Jefferson was one of the founders of our country, and he was a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. Since there is no one still living that was a citizen at the time the Constitution was adopted, in1787, our President must now be natural born citizen. Obama is not a natural born citizen. Why are you so hateful? A mind is like a parachute-if it is not open, it will not work. See my comments above. I explained all this months ago.

  18. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #18

    McCain was not a …
    McCain was not a natural born citizen either. The Constitution states, “Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution states, “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

  19. bexstarr
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #19

    What made him a …
    What made him a citizen? By your definition, he was not a “natural citizen”. His mother was born in the UK. Also, there is no where in the constitution that states that to be a natural born citizen, both parents have to be born in the US. This is something the birther movement has made up. You probably supported John McCain who admitted he was born in Colon, Panama. Not US soil like the constitution states. Would you still make this argument if he were elected president? I bet not.

  20. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #20

    Thomas Jefferson …
    Thomas Jefferson was the First Black President, not Obama. His mother was NOT from the UK, she was an American Indian, and his father was half black. Also, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Dwight Eisenhower were all part black.

  21. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #21

    The Constitution …
    The Constitution states,” No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President”-Thomas Jefferson was a citizen, at the time the Constitution was adopted in 1787. The nation’s oldest “natural born citizens” were only babies at the time. You should try looking at the facts before you start crying racism, everytime you get stumped.

  22. bexstarr
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #22

    By your definition, …
    By your definition, Thomas Jefferson should not have been president. His mother was born in UK, a foreign country, and his father was born in Virginia. You have no idea what you are talking about. Get over it. Obama won. You are just angry that a man who is not fully white is president.

  23. Bigone5555J
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #23

    The truth is that …
    The truth is that Obama’s father was not a US citizen, and a natural born citizen is the child of US citizen parents, born on US soil. Having only one citizen parent will not suffice. You think that we should let this slide just because of Obama’s race? John McCain willingly provided his Birth Certificate, yet Obama refuses. Why? He is the only candidate in the history of this country that has show such contempt for the Constitution he swore to protect.

  24. informatist
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #24

    Good Lord… you …
    Good Lord… you people are nit-picking this to death… and I really hope you push it as far as it can feesibly go so that you are all shamed by the truth you discover.
    The ultimate truth is that no other President in US History has ever been subjected to the kind of scrutiny that the first black President has.

  25. NadnChicky
    December 10th, 2009 at 02:15 | #25

    When will we as a …
    When will we as a country stand up and demand that we see the one document that would put all these issues to rest?
    Barack Hussein Obama is not an American.
    We have a spy in the whitehouse.
    Will you truly be suprised when the next “terrorist attack” happens on our soil?
    Do you truly believe that 911 was not an inside job? In the day and age when our government knows everything about everyone, even at the outset they knew what was coming and did nothing. Impeach BHO NOW!!!

  1. No trackbacks yet.